ISSN: 1673-825X    Imprint: Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications Journal
Volume listings
  • Current volume
  •  
  • Search by keywords:
  • Search by 
  • Keywords
  • To
  • Journal archive
Related Links

 

Publication ethics and malpractice statement of Journal of Chongqing University of

 

Posts and Telecommunications (Natural Science Edition)

 

 

 

1.Publication responsibilities

Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Natural Science Edition) founded in 1988 (ISSN1673-825XCN50-1181/NCODENCYDXA4) by Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications and in the charge of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission, is a highly professional academic publication featured with information science. It publishes the newest research achievements in the field of electronics, communications, computer and automatic control.aims to provide an overview of the development and progress in the fields of telecommunications, electronics, computer science, and automation science, and to spread new technology, facilitating the research and application and promoting the technological innovation of the fields. It is committed to serving as a vast academic exchange platform for teachers and researchers of telecommunications, electronics, computer science, and automation science both in China and other areas. The content is new, authentic and reliable. It refuses fraudulent and plagiarized paper to publish. The journal publication is on time.

2. Editorial responsibilities

Editors should be responsible for everything published in the journal and strive to: improve journal quality constantly to meet the needs of readers and authors; ensure the quality of the material they publish; champion freedom of expression; preclude business needs from compromising intellectual standards; always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed; willing to help readers communicate with authors. To inform authors the peer-review suggestion and amending idea to satisfy editorial standard in time. Respect peer-review opinion, protect creative enthusiasm of authors at the same time, when serious difference between the review point of authors and review expert appears, invite over two experts to reexamine.

Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article. Editors should have no conflict of interest with respect to articles they reject/accept, only to accept a paper when reasonably certain. When errors are found, promote publication of correction or retraction, preserve anonymity of reviewers. 

3. Author’s responsibilities 

Author’s article must be original works, no plagiarism; the data in article must be real and reliable, no fraudulence; if any errors were found, all authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes; reference should be marked out when citing outlook; forbid one paper for more than one journal; all authors in paper must have significantly contributed to the research. 

4. Peer review experts responsibilities 

Valuation of Peer review experts for paper should be objective and just. The viewpoint error, intellectual mistakes, serious copy, suspected fake data are once discovered, should be fed back to journal editorial department. A clear opinion on whether the paper reaches publication criterion should be given. Review experts should have no conflict of interest with respect to articles research content. Review work should be conducted under anonymity. 

5. Solving of academic misconduct

In the course of editing and publication, the following academic misconduct problem may be come across: one paper for more than one journal; plagiarizing others outcome; forging data.

One paper for more than one journal is a misconduct taken by authors in order to publish paper sooner. It causes rehandling work of review experts and editors, resource waste and descending of journal reputation. Once discovered, editors have right to search for the loss from the authors.

Plagiarizing others outcome and forging data is a misconduct and authors should be responsible for the consequences of this article. When the misconduct causes disputation and loss of others, the authors should respond to the charge of victim.

Editors have a duty to act if they suspect misconduct, to ensure the integrity of the academic report. Whenever it is recognized that a significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distorted report has been published, it must be corrected promptly. If, after an appropriate investigation, an item proves to be fraudulent, it should be retracted. The retraction should be clearly identifiable to readers and indexing systems.

If editor has malpractice and guard a pass lax, academic misconduct appears, the reader can complain against editors to the Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Natural Science Edition) editorial department, the Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Natural Science Edition) editorial committee, the journal owner and management department. If the case is true, the editors will be given appropriate punishment, or give a public apology.